Milestones: 1969–1976 - Office of the Historian (2023)

“Milestones in the History of U.S. Foreign Relations” has been retired and is no longer maintained. For more information, please see the full notice.

President Richard M. Nixon assumed responsibility for the Vietnam War as he swore the oath of office on January 20, 1969. He knew that ending this war honorably was essential to his success in the presidency. He expected that the American people would give him a year to end U.S. involvement in the war, and he expected to succeed during that time—believing that his experience in foreign relations, his toughness, and his willingness to bring to bear military and political pressure on North Vietnam would yield a settlement in the public negotiations just opening in Paris.

(Video) Richard Nixon: The Biggest Scandal in American History

Milestones: 1969–1976 - Office of the Historian (1)

President Richard M. Nixon and President Thieu at Midway, June 1969. (Nixon Presidential Library)

(Video) Wernher von Braun - The Nazi inside NASA Documentary

In his first months in office, Nixon directed the U.S. military to increase its pressure on the battlefield, while ordering the secret B–52 bombings of North Vietnamese base camps in Cambodia—the “Menu bombings”—as a signal of his willingness to further escalate the war. He expected to complement this military pressure with conciliatory negotiating terms in the newly begun negotiations, and with diplomatic pressure on the Soviet Union, hoping the Soviet Union would encourage their North Vietnamese allies to engage in serious negotiations. These forms of pressure, however, brought him no closer to ending the war. In order to buy time with the American people, Nixon began to withdraw forces from Vietnam, meeting with South Vietnam’s President Nguyen Van Thieu on Midway Island on June 8 to announce the first increment of redeployment. From that point on, the U.S. troop withdrawal never ceased. As U.S. troop strength and capabilities declined, the United States worked toward building South Vietnam’s military capacity through a program known as “Vietnamization.” It would remain a constant question over the remaining years of the administration, whether the South Vietnamese could build the combat capability, logistics and planning capacity, and leadership at the national and military levels to face the North Vietnamese on their own.

It quickly became apparent that the public peace talks in Paris were being used as propaganda theater by both sides, and that any productive negotiations would have to be done in private. On August 4, the President’s Assistant for National Security Affairs Henry Kissinger conducted his first private session with the North Vietnamese leadership. He would meet with North Vietnamese Politburo member Le Duc Tho intermittently over the following months, with no apparent progress toward a settlement.

In the fall of 1969, disappointed with the lack of any visible results from this strategy, Nixon and Kissinger directed an extensive planning effort assessing the possibility of coercing the North Vietnamese into negotiations through a series of “short, sharp blows” inflicted by air and naval forces. The political-military planning included a cell of National Security Council staff members examining strategic issues, and a military planning team comprised of Joint Staff, Pacific Command (PACOM), and Military Assistance Command Vietnam (MACV) officers working at MACV Headquarters in Saigon. Nixon met with the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) on October 11, and it became clear that the planning had satisfied neither the White House nor the JCS. With American casualties on the decline, the anti-war movement still a powerful force, and no satisfactory political-military solution in sight, Nixon turned away from that option to deliver the “silent majority” speech on November 3, 1969, rallying the American people toward patient support for a protracted war. The administration would continue its dual strategy of Vietnamization and negotiation.

(Video) The Hornby Story

In March 1970 the fall of Prince Norodom Sihanouk in Cambodia destroyed the fragile neutrality of that state, as his successor Lon Nol demanded the North Vietnamese withdraw from their base camps along the South Vietnamese border. The North Vietnamese reacted by extending their presence toward the west. Nixon responded by ordering a US-South Vietnamese “incursion” into Cambodia on April 30. Limited by Nixon to a 30-kilometer strip along the border, and limited in time to the end of June, this action sparked violent protests on campuses across the United States. These culminated in the deaths of four students at Kent State University on May 4. The incursion into the North Vietnamese Army (NVA) base camps yielded a great quantity of rice, weapons, and ammunition, and disrupted the North Vietnamese command and logistics structures for months, buying time for Vietnamization and further U.S. troop withdrawals.

The following spring, Nixon ordered a theater-wide offensive, seeking to seize the initiative in the war. South Vietnamese forces crossed into Cambodia and Laos in early February 1971. The North Vietnamese had anticipated the incursion into Laos, known as Lam Son 719, and massed their forces in an attempt to annihilate the South Vietnamese. The South Vietnamese withdrawal disintegrated into a disorderly retreat.

Meanwhile, Nixon and Kissinger sought to reshape the international context of the war through building relationships with North Vietnam’s superpower allies in Moscow and Beijing. Nixon wanted to create a dilemma for the Soviet and Chinese—give them “bigger fish to fry,” in his phrase—in choosing between their support of North Vietnam, and a closer relationship with the United States. The 1972 summits in Beijing and Moscow reflected this strategy, though the Communist powers continued their material support of Hanoi.

(Video) Cotton Fields (1969) - CREEDENCE CLEARWATER REVIVAL (CCR) - Lyrics

The North Vietnamese opened a three-pronged offensive in South Vietnam, known in the United States as the Easter Offensive, in late March 1972, expecting that a victory on the battlefield would translate into a triumph at the negotiating table. Rather than accept the prospect of defeat, Nixon sent massive air force and naval reinforcements to bases in Indochina and Guam. On May 4 he decided to mine North Vietnam’s harbors and open a sustained air offensive, Operation Linebacker, against North Vietnam. These actions, along with intensive air attacks in the battle areas and improved South Vietnamese defenses, stymied North Vietnam’s offensive, leading the Politburo, for the first time, to engage in serious negotiations.

On October 11–12 Kissinger and Le Duc Tho reached agreement on a peace settlement, both sides working to reach that end before the U.S. presidential election on November 7. President Thieu rejected the settlement, refusing to accept a peace that left North Vietnamese forces in South Vietnam, and legitimized the Hanoi-controlled Communist shadow government, the Provisional Revolutionary Government. His rejection forced Kissinger to resume negotiations with Le Duc Tho.

Kissinger was unable to find any common ground acceptable to both Vietnamese parties in two renewed rounds of negotiations. Finally, in order to break the deadlock, on December 14 Nixon ordered massive B–52 attacks on the North Vietnamese heartland—the “Christmas Bombing.” Meanwhile he continued to exert intense pressure on Thieu, threatening to cut off U.S. economic, military, and political support of South Vietnam if Thieu refused to accept the agreement. Negotiations resumed on January 8, 1973, and the United States and the Democratic Republic of Vietnam initialed the agreement on January 23. Thieu reluctantly accepted the settlement despite his continued misgivings, and the peace agreement was signed on January 27.

(Video) how we turn CORN into PLASTIC!

The peace settlement enabled the United States to withdraw from the war and welcome the American prisoners of war back home. Neither of the Vietnamese parties abided by the settlement, however, and the war continued.

Nixon had gained Thieu’s adherence to the agreement through a series of letters and envoys, all promising U.S. military support in the event of a North Vietnamese violation of the accords. On November 14, 1972, for example, Nixon wrote Thieu that “I repeat my personal assurances to you that the United States will react very strongly and rapidly to any violation of the agreement.” Both sides understood this to mean the recommitment of B–52s to combat. In the end, these commitments were not upheld due to a combination of factors—domestic and Congressional reluctance to re-engage in the war, economic constraints, and finally the Watergate scandal, which weakened and distracted Nixon. Having rebuilt their forces and upgraded their logistics system, North Vietnamese forces triggered a major offensive in the Central Highlands in March 1975. On April 30, 1975, NVA tanks rolled through the gate of the Presidential Palace in Saigon, effectively ending the war.


What happened to the milestones in the history of US Foreign Relations Publications? ›

This publication, “Milestones in the History of U.S. Foreign Relations,” has been retired. The text remains online for reference purposes, but it is no longer being maintained or expanded.

Is Office of the Historian reliable? ›

The Office of the Historian is staffed by professional historians who are experts in the history of U.S. foreign policy and the Department of State and possess unparalleled research experience in classified and unclassified government records.

What is the US Office of the Historian? ›

The Office of the Historian is responsible, under law, for the preparation and publication of the official documentary history of U.S. foreign policy in the "Foreign Relations of the United States" series.

Who runs the office of historian? ›

Office of the Historian
Office overview
Office executiveAdam Howard, Historian
Parent departmentUnited States Department of State
Parent OfficeForeign Service Institute

What are three key events historical developments during the 20th century that have shaped international relations? ›

The World Wars sparked tension between countries and led to the creation of atomic bombs, the Cold War led to the Space Race and creation of space-based rockets, and the World Wide Web was created. These advancements have played a significant role in citizens' lives and shaped the 21st century into what it is today.

What was the most important foreign policy events of the Kennedy administration? ›

Kennedy did have one triumph of foreign policy: the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962, the closest the world has come to nuclear war.

What is the most credible source of history? ›

The National Archives and Records Administration is the nation's record keeper. This site contains a variety of records and historical documents and even has online exhibits. NCAI was established in 1944 works to protect Native American's rights.

Who is the most respected historian? ›

Each of the historians profiled here have made significant contributions to historical scholarship.
Ten Most Influential Historians Today
  • Niall Ferguson.
  • Simon Schama.
  • Timothy Snyder.
  • Henry Reynolds.
  • Anthony Grafton.
  • Marnie Hughes-Warrington.
  • Eric Foner.
  • Dipesh Chakrabarty.
May 18, 2020

How do you know if a historian is reliable? ›

Based on what you discovered in your analysis of the source, you can establish reliability based on any of the following: The author/creator of the source was present at the time of the event. The author/creator of the source has a highly educated perspective on the topic, e.g. a university professor.

How do you cite the Office of the Historian? ›

Cite volumes by URL

URLs to Foreign Relations documents always follow this structure: the Office of the Historian's website domain (“”), section (“historicaldocuments”), volume identifier (“frus1969-76v19p1”), and document identifier (“d75”).

How do you get the title historian? ›

Historians typically need a master's degree or Ph. D. to enter the occupation. Many historians have a master's degree in history or public history. Others complete degrees in related fields, such as museum studies, historical preservation, or archival management.

Is the historian a special staff officer? ›

Historians are not administrative or public affairs and are not assigned to either the battalion or brigade personnel staff officer (S-1) or the command public affairs office.

How much do government historians make? ›

How much does a Historian in the federal government get paid? $111,720.45* *Based on the 2021 average. Historian was the 298th most popular job in the U.S. Government in 2021, with 277 employed. The most common payscale was the general schedule payscale.

What is the highest salary of historian? ›

Salary Ranges for Historians

The salaries of Historians in the US range from $16,990 to $450,370 , with a median salary of $80,952 .

How does historian make money? ›

After becoming a Historian, one can get employed in Editing and Publishing, Education, Historical Associations, Government Organizations, Research Sphere, etc. How much does an experienced Historian get paid? An experienced Historian in India can earn up to 16 LPA and above.

What were the three foreign policy eras of the United States? ›

Three approaches: Wilsonian idealism, realism, revisionism.

How did newspaper and magazines relate to American foreign policy at the end of the 19th century? ›

How did newspapers and magazines relate to American foreign policy at the end of the 19th century? Stories about distant places were popular and encouraged calls for a larger American role in world affairs.

Why was America hesitant at first to get involved in foreign affairs in history? ›

Initially, Americans did not look to take over other countries. Having been colonists themselves, many Americans were against it. America also feared that foreign involvement would bring the country into a war. However, attitudes began to change in the late 1800's as America began to look to the Pacific.

What are the particularly important historical events that have shaped international relations? ›

  • The roots of World War I, 1871–1914. The Bismarckian system, 1871–90. ...
  • World War I, 1914–18. ...
  • Peacemaking, 1919–22. ...
  • A fragile stability, 1922–29. ...
  • The origins of World War II, 1929–39. ...
  • World War II, 1939–45. ...
  • The coming of the Cold War, 1945–57. ...
  • Total Cold War and the diffusion of power, 1957–72.


1. The Decades of Gaming: 1949-1976. From the Birth of Video Games to Pong
(Mr. Itchy Wrath)
2. Computer History Milestones
3. Metropolis, IL: The Amazing...and Forgotten World of Superman
(US 101)
4. 75 years of Oerlikon Balzers – From an idea to a global technology leader
(Oerlikon Balzers)
5. History of the SM7 and SM5 with Shure Historian, Michael Pettersen
6. History of Virology (Detailed Explanation)
(Mfonido Okon)


Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Foster Heidenreich CPA

Last Updated: 05/18/2023

Views: 5257

Rating: 4.6 / 5 (56 voted)

Reviews: 95% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Foster Heidenreich CPA

Birthday: 1995-01-14

Address: 55021 Usha Garden, North Larisa, DE 19209

Phone: +6812240846623

Job: Corporate Healthcare Strategist

Hobby: Singing, Listening to music, Rafting, LARPing, Gardening, Quilting, Rappelling

Introduction: My name is Foster Heidenreich CPA, I am a delightful, quaint, glorious, quaint, faithful, enchanting, fine person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.